Archive for the ‘Consumer Editing’ category

Consumers, Students and Editors

August 17, 2007

One key issue that Avid and Apple are both facing is the synergy between different groups of editors. Based on the applications they sell, Apple thinks there are three groups: consumers, “prosumers” and professional editors (of all types) — iMovie, Final Cut Express and Final Cut Studio. There’s a clear migration path from FCE to FCS but iMovie is separate.

Avid also has a consumer product that’s completely separate from its other offerings — Pinnacle Studio. And with at least three families of professional editing applications and many subtle variants, Avid wants to view the pro world as heavily segmented. (I’ve argued before that all these offerings confuse and frustrate customers and hurt the brand.)

Most of the young editors arriving in Hollywood already know FCP. Generally, my advice to them is that if they want a career editing long-form, narrative films they need to learn Media Composer. There just aren’t many high-end projects that are cutting with FCP. You can argue that this is because us Hollywood types are old curmudgeons, but I’d counter that, for all its many strengths, FCP is just not as good as MC with narrative material.

Nevertheless, FCP has made editing sexy to young filmmakers and the fact that they all seem to know that application represents a tide that will inevitably have its effect at the higher end.

But consider the consumer market for a moment. Wouldn’t Apple and Avid want to see young people learning their preferred interface as early as possible? Apparently not. Both companies seem to think that whatever people are using at home, when they get serious they’ll be willing to learn something new — and hopefully something that isn’t made by the other guy. iMovie at least shares the look of Apple’s pro aps, which might engender some brand loyalty. But mostly, it’s a radical redesign. Pinnacle Studio has next to nothing in common with Media Composer.

Does this represent a failure of imagination? Or … is the new iMovie so fast and intuitive that kids who cut their teeth with it will expect something equally slick when they need more — something that nobody makes yet?

Technorati Tags: , ,

How much editing does the average person need?

August 15, 2007

imovie screen shotWhen Apple didn’t release an upgrade to the iLife suite at this year’s Macworld, some people speculated that an announcement would have stolen focus from the iPhone, or that perhaps the new version was only going to work with Leopard. But now that iLife ’08 has been released, I think the reason might have been that it just wasn’t ready. An awful lot of work has gone into these applications — a new level of interface slickness and integration.

You can watch an excellent introduction to the new features here: iLife 08 Guided Tour. Apple has been moving to slick, highly produced, video-based tutorials. This one not only gives you a look at all the new features, but offers useful information and training. (Avid is putting up free training videos, too. Check them out here: Media Composer videos.)

My first impression of iLife is its user focus. They’ve consistently asked “what does the customer want to do” and answered it throughout the program. From a development standpoint, It’s always easier to ask “what can the machine do?” Apple’s approach can limit choices, but if done right, it’s much more intuitive for the user. That takes time, money and vision.

iLife, like the recent changes to the Final Cut Suite, focuses on high-bandwidth visual feedback. For example, they now offer something called “skimming.” Click and drag on a clip in iMovie to shuttle through it. Move your cursor over an image in iPhoto to flip through all the images in a gallery.

Overall, iMovie is the biggest surprise, because it’s been completely rewritten. It’s now designed as a library manager, more like iPhoto and iTunes, and as a way to quickly slam cuts together, add some music and automatically publish the results to the web. The old iMovie was very DV-centric. The new version seems to be format-agnostic. And it adopts Apple’s new media application look and feel — dark backgrounds, lighting effects on surfaces.

There’s been a lot of debate (for example, here and here) about the new iMovie, primarily because many capabilities have been eliminated. For starters, there’s no timeline at all. And there are far fewer visual effects (but none require rendering). You select material by simply dragging over a clip icon, so precise editing is nearly impossible. My sense from the guided tour is that the program excels in the kind of quick and dirty editing we see more and more now, and I suspect that it will appeal to many people.

Though I like the browsing and publishing features, with such limited editing controls I doubt that I’ll have much use for it. But it represents a vision of what the consumer wants, and whether it succeeds or fails I have to give Apple credit for aggressively rethinking entrenched ideas and trying something new.

Technorati Tags: