Archive for June 2007

More Laptop Issues

June 29, 2007

Numeric Trim Displays

More and more, I see myself working from various locations on a show — anchored in an editing room, of course, but bringing stuff home or to the set to work on or to show people.

Avid could do some useful work in this area, making it easier for us to edit on the go. I mentioned some of these things yesterday. Here are a couple of additional things I’d like to see:

1. “Pack and Go” — I’d like to be able to select a bin or bins and tell the system to copy all relevant media, and the bins themselves, to another drive or to a laptop. Media should be put in the right place, bins go into the project folder on the laptop. One-click simplicity.

2. The Media Composer expects you to have a dedicated numeric keypad. But laptops don’t have them, and that creates some problems. You can change a dissolve length in the timeline using the regular number keys (at the top of the keyboard). But if you want to trim numerically — or even just move around in the timeline numerically — you’ve got to hit the number lock key, use the embedded keypad (and go blind finding the keys) and then finally turn number lock off, because it locks out all the other keys. Final Cut does not have this problem. You can trim and move around with the normal number keys. And Final Cut adds another bit of finesse — when you customize your keyboard, the template is smart enough to show you the keyboard you’re really using.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Heads Up Displays

June 28, 2007

Heads Up Displays in iPhotoMany of the new Apple applications employ what the company calls “heads up displays.” These are control panels that are translucent and appear over the image you’re working on, fading in and out as needed. You can see them in iPhoto, Aperture, Motion and Quicktime. They look cool, but more important, they’re functional, because they let you do useful work on a full-sized image. They’re particularly helpful for small (ie. laptop) displays, where screen real estate is at a premium.

As I use my laptop more and more for cutting, I’m starting to see how valuable such displays could be in a mobile editing environment.

Because, in the laptop environment, the Media Composer definitely has some rough edges. When I’m working with the laptop itself, I want one window layout. But when I plug in to a bigger monitor and use the laptop screen as a bin monitor, I want another. The MC can handle this, but it takes a lot of fiddling around. And even when you have your workspaces all set up the way you want them, the system often does the wrong thing.

In general, the MC needs some tweaking around the issue of window activation. For example, when I double-click on a sequence I want the Composer window and the Timeline to activate and move forward. But now, only the Composer window does so. I also want the ability to quickly tab from bin to bin.

And that leads me back to the subject of heads up displays. How about this? Wouldn’t it be nice to work in full screen mode (video playing full screen) — but with a translucent timeline supered over it? The timeline (and maybe the editing controls from the bottom of the composer window — what Avid calls the ‘mini–composer’) would appear when you move the mouse, and they’d disappear when video plays for a moment. That sure would make for a slick, small-screen editing environment.

Heads up displays would also be great in a redesigned full screen title tool, much as they now allow for full screen editing in iPhoto.

What else could you do with this kind of interface?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

To Gloss or Not to Gloss?

June 26, 2007

I’m about to replace my G4 laptop with a 15″ Macbook Pro. And I’m torn about the screen. This will be a general purpose computer — email & web, word processing, some editing and still photography (using a second monitor when possible).

I’ve looked at the glossy and matte screens pretty carefully. Glossy seems sharper and I tend to like it better — but if you have a light source behind your head, you see reflections clearly. For editing, glossy makes video look more like a TV, and thus more appealing, but for stills it seems almost too sharp and edgy.

Does anybody here have experience with the new glossy screens on the Macbook Pros? What do you think? Better or worse?

More on the Title Tool

June 26, 2007

Grant has posted some great suggestions for a new title tool on his blog “Avid Tips.” He’s hoping you all will weigh in with your ideas, either here or on his site, and then he hopes to collect all the material from both blogs (see my previous post) and present it to his friends at Avid. I think that’s a great idea, so I hope you will add your comments here or on Avid Tips and let us know what you’d like to see.

Meanwhile, I’ll add a few additional suggestions. Though I think the title tool needs to be scraped and replaced, there are some things that Avid could do short-term that would help, too.

For example:

  1. Improve the way a title’s bounding box resizes. No matter what you do, the size of the box that contains a title adjusts every time you change the font or font size — but, like an old Detroit seatbelt, the box can get tighter, but it can never get loser. When you switch to a font with narrower letters, the box gets smaller. If you then switch back to the original font, it doesn’t get bigger again, the line breaks change. Even undo doesn’t get around this bug.
  2. Put render files for changed titles where I want them. Every time I change a title, a new master clip is created — and it automatically goes into the same bin as the sequence that contained the original title. That’s not where I want them. Please let me specify a bin for these things.
  3. Work on the typography. I have a lot of fonts installed. They look fine in every application — except in the MC, where kerning is so uneven that it’s almost comical. No matter what font I pick I can’t make a good-looking title.

And finally, make it easier to create a series of similar titles. Let’s say I’ve made a title card I like. I now want to make 10 or 12 more with the same font, size, drop shadow, alignment, length and fade length. The easiest way to do that is to copy the title, put it into the source monitor, cut it in again, and modify the text. Sounds easy, right? Well, here are the steps:

  • Mark in and out on the existing title. Select the appropriate track. Hit command-option-c (copy to source monitor).
  • Mark in on the record monitor and edit the old title to a new position.
  • Park over the title, go into effects mode, then select the little “modify” button on the effects palette.
  • The title tool opens, change your text, resize the bounding box, as needed (#1, above).
  • Close the title tool. The precompute is saved (in the wrong place — #2, above).
  • So much for the first title of 10.
  • Now make another. Woops — the title I carefully placed in the source monitor is now gone, replaced by the full master clip of the modified title. So — start over at the top of the list.

All this to copy one title and change its text.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Fixing the Title Tool

June 24, 2007

Avid needs to start building a suite to compete with Apple and Adobe. It’s got the best video ap, and it’s got the best audio ap (except that it won’t work software-only). That’s a pretty good start. Avid certainly needs a DVD tool and a compression utility. But, for my money, the first order of business is a title animation tool to compete with Motion.

Titling is now part of the responsibility of most editors on all kinds of shows. These days, I help create the main title on every show I work on. And I’d do more if the tools were better. But the Avid tools are antiquated. You can’t create a modern, nuanced title with the Title Tool and it takes way, way too much work to do it with Marquee.

Avid can look at this as a problem or as an opportunity. The opportunity is to start with a clean slate and create something better than what the other guy is offering.

Here what I’d like to see:

  1. Don’t make a separate title application — build this functionality into the MC. I have no interest in creating a separate title project to go along with my MC project. I don’t want to manage both, archive both and move back and forth between them. I want the whole thing integrated into one environment.
  2. It should be as live as possible. The editor should design based on moving video.
  3. It should work with organic actions, like Motion does — or with keyframes. The editor should be able to move back and forth between these approaches as needed.
  4. It should support the use of a tablet or touch pad to create complex movements by showing the system what you want.
  5. It should be vector-based. No rendering. Simple scaling. Easy changes.
  6. It should offer title styles. Create your style, then create titles based on it. Want to make a change to all of them, say a different font or font size? Just change the style and all titles update automatically.
  7. It should export digital mattes at any resolution you want. That’s how you get your work out of the MC and into the finishing system of your choice. And it should do intelligent aspect ratio conversions, so you can work at letter-boxed standard def and still create useful mattes for HD or film.

Now wouldn’t that be cool? Wouldn’t you do a lot more slick title work if you had a tool like that?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

More Home Movie Woes

June 19, 2007

I did some more work cutting together home movies on Media Composer software over the weekend. And I discovered that the “stop delay” is even worse than I thought. With standard def 14:1 media (PAL) the problem is relatively subtle (picture stops precisely, audio continues to play for two frames). But with Firewire-acquired DV the delay is much longer — four or five frames, picture and sound. It’s just downright impossible to cut accurately this way. You have to noodle every cut and there’s no such thing as working reflexively and feeling a cut point. Simple trims take twice as long as they should (the delay seems to be worse in trim mode).

Maybe this is because my master clips are an hour long. I don’t know. But I do know that this ought to be fixed pronto.

Technorati Tags: